Welcome back!
To access the BAI Banking Strategies subscriber edition, please log in with your bai.org account ID and password.

 

Not sure if you have a BAI Account?

 
 
 
 
Forgot your password?
Please enter the Account ID you used to subscribe and we will send you an email with instructions on how to change your password.
 
 
 

Subscribing gives you free access to hundreds of articles and other benefits including new issue email alerts. Already registered with BAI? Click here to log in and subscribe. Not sure if you have a BAI Account? Click here to find out. Otherwise, create a BAI Account below to subscribe.

*
*
*
 
*
 
*
*
*


highlights

 



While new regulatory restrictions on overdraft charges may force large banks to abandon free checking, the product remains a competitive differentiator at community banks.



Free Checking Dead? Not at Community Banks
While new regulatory restrictions on overdraft charges may force large banks to abandon free checking, the product remains a competitive differentiator at community banks. byALAN FRIESEN
Mar 1, 2010  |  7 Comments
text downText - text upText + emailEmail printPrint share Share

New regulations and the potential of additional, legislated restrictions on overdrafts have many saying that the era of free checking has come to an end. After all, overdraft fee income is the only reason these accounts are profitable, right? Wrong.

The profitability of free checking has never depended upon overdraft income.

In the early 1980s, for example, when interest rates were at all-time highs, overdraft income was negligible. Today, we see interest rates at all-time lows and overdraft income has become enormous. Free checking operated profitably at all points during this period. What changed was the large banks’ linkage of free checking and overdraft fees in the last four or five years.

Historically, free checking began with community banks and thrifts (often clients of Haberfeld Associates). Within the last ten years many large institutions began offering the product (rather grudgingly) to stem the tide of defecting customers and because they saw a revenue opportunity with overdraft fees. During this time, consultants began to encourage institutions large and small to offer “free checking with overdraft privilege.” Meanwhile, the use of debit cards exploded, creating a perfect storm of sorts because these cards tend to cause customers (unknowingly) to exceed their account limits. That’s why you read about people getting hit with $35 overdraft charges on $5 lattes.

In the wake of new Federal Reserve restrictions on overdraft charges, many in the industry are predicting that free checking is dead because many financial institutions use overdraft and nonsufficient funds (NSF) fees to subsidize their free checking products. While that may be true for large banks, free checking is likely to remain very much alive at community banks.

Voice of the Customer

The reason is that bank customers today have come to expect free checking and don’t believe they should have to pay the bank to house their money. Customers have also consistently expressed their dislike for regular service charges and minimum balance restrictions. Do they like interest? Of course! However, most customers don’t like the hoops they have to jump through to get it. What they do like is the simplicity and fairness of free checking. New regulations will not change customer preferences.

Can banks make money with free checking when overdraft income is reduced – even dramatically? They can – or at least community banks can. That’s because of the differing cost structures of the two categories of banks.

Large banks open four or five times as many accounts and possess three or four times as many customers as community banks per branch. Because their branches are much closer to capacity, they may decide that they can afford to lose some customers and the incremental costs that go along with those customers if they have to take a 15% to 25% haircut on overdraft fee income.

After all, the biggest advantage large banks offer to their customers is the convenience of large branch and ATM networks. This, as opposed to product, is their competitive advantage; as long as they retain that advantage, they should be able to retain many of their customers by jettisoning free checking.

Community banks, on the other hand, offer customers much less convenience and their branches possess lots of capacity to add new customers with almost no additional cost. The branch system, after all, is a bank’s single largest expense. Once this investment has been made, it is necessary to staff it appropriately. Even the bare minimum staffing still leaves a lot of unused capacity for the typical community bank.

Most community banks operate with around 1,000 checking accounts per branch, according to our data, with capacity to double that without adding any staff or facility upgrades. Each additional customer, meanwhile, only adds between $10 and $15 in expense per year – mostly the costs to render statements. It is a rare customer that does not provide enough revenue to cover those small costs.

So you can see it’s in the best interests of community banks to gather every additional customer they can and free checking is a way for them to attract those customers. Now, consider the benefits the typical free checking customer provides the bank:

  • Average account balances of $1,100 that earn no interest;
  • At the household level, more than four total products and services and over $7,000 in total deposit balances, 74% of these being low-cost, core deposits;
  • Average overdraft income (whatever that may end up to be) and above average interchange – so there will still be respectable fee income per account.

What’s not to like about that? The checking account is the hub relationship for customers (see chart, “The Hub of the Relationship”) and free checking provides that hub. Once you have that, you get first-right-of-refusal on the rest of that customer’s banking needs. While single-service checking customers do exist, in aggregate the free checking group buys many other profitable products and services from the bank (see chart, “Free Checking: Not a Single-Service Product”).

Free checking is a win-win proposition for community banks, even with the new rules on overdraft. Customers love it and it is quite profitable on its own.

As the big banks begin to pull back from free checking, we expect that the product will attain new life as a competitive differentiator for community banks once again. As a result, community banks with a robust marketing plan will enjoy an influx of new customers they have not experienced in several years.

Rudyard Kipling once said, “If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you … yours is the earth and everything that’s in it . . .” As community bankers, we have the rare opportunity to show we’re not being panicked by the overdraft controversy. In fact, we can view it as an opportunity to gain market share.

No matter what happens with regulation or legislation, if you have lots of customers, you have lots of options. Make sure your bank’s options include free checking.

Mr. Friesen is president and CEO of Lincoln, Neb.-based Haberfeld Associates, a consulting and marketing firm. He can be reached at alan@haberfeld.com.

 

 


comments

Anonymous
3/15/2010 11:38 AM

Big banks or "real" Banks need to remember that they got to where they are today because of the small investor not despite of. The individual or family within the neighborhood they are who you need to look after and attract. As an employee of such a financial (large & impersonal) I can only say that you the large institution are forgetting your roots and sliting your own throats in the process. More of us "little" people will continue to spread the word that the small, community or credit union is the only way to bank. They are here to stay.

Anonymous
3/15/2010 8:13 AM

Exactly which accounts are costing the bank $200 a year? I would assume you're not referring to an account that ends up with a large fraud loss so where are the $200 in costs coming from? The hard costs for servicing an account (bill pay, issuing debit card, mailing statements, etc) are typically less than $30 a year. Even in a full absorption model (where I could see the attributed costs reach over $200 a year), the goal would still be to add accounts and drive that number down. The capacity argument makes sense to me, but I'd like more facts from those who believe free checking operates at a loss.

Anonymous
3/10/2010 4:23 PM

Not certain I see the rationale in this author's 'win-win' argument. One must remember: not every account is a profitable account. Be careful the accounts you attract (and what it costs the bank). It is likely many of those will be more trouble than they are worth. You do not want to retain them. Even if they cost "between $10 and $15 in expense per year," their net value (after acquisition costs) could be -$200.

Anonymous
3/10/2010 10:59 AM

credit unions don't necessarily have lower fees than "real" banks, and the reason people use "real" banks is not only about location but also about products especially in the online banking world that is usually superior to credit unions and smaller banks.

Anonymous
2/6/2010 5:25 PM

Credit unions are the ONLY way to go. Why anyone stays with a "real" bank is beyond me.

Anonymous
2/2/2010 2:30 PM

sd

Anonymous
2/2/2010 11:34 AM

Interesting the author is the president for Haberfeld, the company that promised a wave of fees by attracting the kind of clients driven by Totally Free Checking. The reason free will go away is because banks relied heavily (right or wrong) on that revenue to drive profitability and absent that source, need to fill the void created by the new Reg. Charging for checking is on such stream. Small banks, unfortunately, will always suffer from breadth of franchise, most customers, despite the best efforts of marketing departments’ around the globe still shop by that same old axiom - location, location, location. Which makes free checking not a choice but a competitive necessity.


comment
Comment